Title Goes Here(tm)

      



Fri, Sep 12 2008


WATCH OUT, RUPERT MURDOCH

Really? We can kill the owners of immoral media outlets? Hotdamn - headsup, shareholders of Fox News!

Saudi: OK to kill owners of 'immoral' TV networks

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - Saudi Arabia's top judiciary official has issued a religious decree saying it is permissible to kill the owners of satellite TV networks that broadcast immoral content.

The 79-year-old Sheik Saleh al-Lihedan said Thursday that satellite channels cause the "deviance of thousands of people."

Many of the most popular Arab satellite networks — which include channels showing music videos often denounced as obscene by Muslim conservatives — are owned by Saudi princes and well-connected Saudi businessmen. Al-Lihedan did not specify any particular channels.

Al-Lihedan is chief of the kingdom's highest tribunal, the Supreme Judiciary Council. Saudi Arabia's judiciary is made up of Islamic clerics whose decrees, or fatwas, on everyday issues are widely respected. Their fatwas do not have the weight of law. In the courts, cleric-judges rule according to Islamic law, but interpretations can vary.

Al-Lihedan was answering listeners' questions during the daily "Light in the Path" radio program in which he and others make rulings on what is permissible under Islamic law.

One caller asked about Islam's view of the owners of satellite TV channels that show "bad programs" during Ramadan.

"I want to advise the owners of these channels, who broadcast calls for such indecency and impudence ... and I warn them of the consequences," he said.

"What does the owner of these networks think, when he provides seduction, obscenity and vulgarity?" he said.

"Those calling for corrupt beliefs, certainly it's permissible to kill them," he said. "Those calling for sedition, those who are able to prevent it but don't, it is permissible to kill them."

Among the most viewed Arabic satellite networks is Rotana, which airs movies and music videos. It is owned by Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, a billionaire businessman and member of the royal family whom Forbes ranks as the world's 13th richest person.

Al-Lihedan sparked controversy in the past by issuing a decree that Saudis can join jihadists to fight U.S. troops in Iraq.

posted by JDoe at 04:18:50 PM | link |


Fri, Sep 12 2008


HUMBUG UPON HUMBUG

WHEN SCAMS COLLIDE

by Bill Bonner

The dewy Democrat rolled along smartly in his new "change-mobile." Then, under pressure from the knuckleheads in his own party, he reversed to pick up that babbling hack, Joe Biden, as his running mate - and ran right into his own fraud. Biden is to Obama what Monica Lewinsky's blue dress was to Bill Clinton - the dumb thing that reveals the spoken lie.

Biden demolished his own presidential campaign in 1987 by pretending to be British Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Not only did he recite Kinnock's lines about being the first in his family to go to university, he also stole his identity, claiming that his father had worked in the coalmines. His own father was actually a polo-playing car salesman from Baltimore. But if the media hadn't stopped him, he probably be collecting Kinnock's pension by now.

Apparently, the better you know Biden, the less you like him. In his home state, 97% of voters refused to back him in the presidential primary. But that was Biden in the '80s. In the '00s, Biden is, supposedly, on the ticket because he knows who Saakashvili is. In truth, he's there because the old nags in the Democratic Party wanted someone they could trust on the ticket - a real go-along, get-along backslapper. They turned to Biden, in other words, not for change, but to avoid it. And now, Obama and Biden are trailing in the polls. Americans don't mind a liar in high office; but they're suspicious of one who can't keep his lies straight.

Meanwhile, over in the Republican camp, that tough old salt, McCain, has come about smartly, outmaneuvering the Dems by choosing a baroque woman from Alaska as his #2. But here too, he's run into his own humbug. If military experience were so important to the nation's top office, you'd think he - at 72 years old - would want a serious chief mate to take command if he were struck down. Ms. Palin's military experience is limited to 22 months as captain of the Alaska National Guard. Then again, she might be an improvement over McCain anyway.

His right to rule, McCain says, comes from his superior command of the military situation. But the claim looks counterfeit. During his tour of duty McCain, lost five U.S. Navy aircraft, four in accidents, one in combat. The first one went down in Corpus Christi Bay when he was practicing landings. The second crash occurred over Spain, when he was flying too low. He took out some power lines and bailed out. Number three was wrecked when he was flying into Philadelphia for an Army-Navy football game. The fourth one, at least, was not his fault. An accidentally-fired rocket hit his plane when he was waiting to take off. The resulting explosion killed 134 sailors, destroyed 20 aircraft and nearly sank the ship. Finally, in 1967, he got shot down, roughed up…and then, by his own admission, collaborated with the enemy in order to save his skin. Maybe getting shot down was just bad luck too, but sailors are a superstitious lot. They'd probably give the heave-ho to this right Jonah rather than set sail with him as captain.

Of course, the financial world too is full of mountebanks, cads, and imposters. Who can forget Alan Greenspan's famous remark that a nationwide decline in housing prices was "most unlikely?" Or Ben Bernanke's suggestion a year ago that subprime losses wouldn't exceed $100 billion (they're now about $500 billion, and still growing)? Or bond appraisers' Triple A ratings for what turned out to be junk debt?

"I have enormous confidence in BSAM [Bear Stearns Asset Management] and the ability of our talented professionals… You can count on us to deliver," wrote James E. Cayne, CEO of Bear Stearns to his customers a year ago. The talented professionals on Wall Street did make good work of it, taking the bumpers off portfolios all over the world.

But it is where the scam of government - that every citizen can live at the expense of everyone else - meets the scam of finance - that we can all get rich without working, saving, or taking any risk - that the biggest wrecks occur. Last Sunday, we heard the rubber squeal: the U.S. government took control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - America's government sponsored mortgage backers. The Financial Times dutifully reported that this nationalization - the biggest in history - will cost the government $200 billion. USA Today reported only that it put the taxpayers on the hook for "trillions." Asked the question by a reporter, Mr. Paulson, Secretary of the Treasury and the man who should know, replied: "We didn't sit there and figure this out with a calculator."

Thus did he drive the nation into the most dangerous intersection in economics - blindfolded. But did bond investors cover their eyes - aghast at the accident that is about to happen? No, they bought the government's paper! Yields fell. Did the taxpayers cringe and howl, in pain and outrage, at the huge new burthen placed upon them on Sunday night? No again. Of course, a nation that robs Peter to pay Paul won't get a whine out of Paul. But what did they think? That they were all Peters? That they would never have to pony up a cent? But there is the point of collision right there. The taxpayers believe the credit of the United States is an unstoppable force. Investors believe the dollar is an immoveable object. Both believe the United States is crash-proof…and that no one will ever have to pay for its bailouts, its bamboozles, and its busted-up humbugs.

Check your airbags.

Enjoy your weekend,

Bill Bonner

The Daily Reckoning

posted by JDoe at 03:36:17 PM | link |


Fri, Sep 12 2008


THE GOP PLATFORM

posted by JDoe at 09:27:44 AM | link |




Copyright © JDoe/Title Goes Here(tm) except where noted.
All news articles and images provided under the Fair Use Notice.